topseos video evaluation
Our Selection Process For
Best Website Audit Services
Best

Top 10 Site Audit Companies

Best Website Audit Services - May 2016

UPWARD
TREND
DOWNWARD
TREND
NO
CHANGE
 
 

Rank

Company Name

Year
Founded

Revenue

Fulltime
Employees

Active
Clients

Client
Retention
Rate

Pricing

Major Clients

Other Core
Services

GAP Analysis

Objective Driven

Audit Report

Efficiency

Variety

Overall Score

0
100
 
G
VG
E
 

Change in Rank

Leaders

1

Foxtail Marketing Lehi, Utah

Mike Templeman
800-273-2113
More info

Visit Website

2013

$3 million - $5 million

35

60+

97%

M

Actian, New Balance Shoes, Qualtrics, Entrata, Infusionsoft

 

100

 

100

 

100

 

100

 

100

100%

NC

 

2

WebiMax Camden, New Jersey

Ken Wisnefski
877-246-2040
More info

Visit Website

2008

Above $10 million

100+

400+

97%

M

Neopost, Blue Mercury, Quaker, Meredith, Carrier

 

100

 

98

 

99

 

100

 

99

99.2%

NC

 

3

Customer Magnetism Virginia Beach, Virginia

Kurt Noer
866-798-3862
More info

Visit Website

2000

$3 million - $5 million

25 - 50

100+

92%

M

ECHO, Sallie Mae, Volvo, Liberty Tax, Dollar Tree

 

96

 

98

 

99

 

98

 

100

98.2%

NC

 
Strong Performers

4

Bruce Clay Moorpark, California

Bruce Clay
866-517-1900
More info

Visit Website

1996

Above $10 million

100+

200

90%

M

FaceBook, Sportsmans Guide, LL Bean, Weather.com, Century21

 

95

 

98

 

97

 

99

 

98

97.4%

NC

 

5

OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions Chicago, Illinois

Solomon Thimothy
800-716-5445
More info

Visit Website

2006

Above $10 million

50

1500+

92%

M

Best Western Suites, Hampton Inn, Quality Inn, Decision Point, LATAN

 

96

 

98

 

97

 

98

 

96

97%

NC

 

6

VJG Interactive San Jose, California

Sabah Noor
844-318-9153
More info

Visit Website

2006

Above $10 million

150+

600+

98%

L

Subway, ACE Hardware, Werth Reality, Studio 8, Circuit City

 

95

 

98

 

96

 

95

 

96

96%

NC

 
Contenders

7

Audit It Madison, Wisconsin

Stephan Spencer
608-285-6600
More info

Visit Website

2000

$250,000 - $1 million

23

45

89%

H

TDS Telecom, Mp3.com, Seton, Wella

 

97

 

96

 

97

 

90

 

97

95.4%
Increased +1

+1

 

8

454 Creative Corp. Orange, California

Paul Bresenden
949-797-6220
More info

Visit Website

2007

$250,000 - $1 million

17

34

94%

M

Eurton Electric, Life Center Church, RWElectrodes, SeaCoast Grace

 

91

 

96

 

96

 

96

 

93

94.4%
Decreased -1

-1

 

9

iCrossing Dallas, Texas

Nick Brien
214-210-6800
More info

Visit Website

1998

Above $10 million

55

100+

90%

H

Toyota, The Coca-Cola Company, The LEGO Group, Bank of America, Mastercard

 

92

 

94

 

94

 

95

 

95

94%

NC

 

10

Connelly Digital Boston, Massachusetts

Matthew Airey
866-500-0751
More info

Visit Website

1999

Above $10 million

35

100+

82%

H

California Paints, Bentley University, Meridian, Massachusetts Office of Travel and Toursim, Cookies by Design

 

95

 

94

 

95

 

88

 

94

93.2%

NC

 
Evaluation Criteria: Best Site Audit Companies
GAP Analysis Find Performance Holes

During a site audit, it is important for the vendor to communicate to their client where their website is in terms of performance and what their desired or potential performance is. During our evaluation of website audit companies, we look into the methods used by each vendor to measure performance and to determine the expectations which the client has for their performance in addition to the actual performance possible to achieve.

Objective Driven Focus on Objectives

When performing a website audit, we ensure the vendors which we recommend take into consideration the individual goals and objectives of each customer website as opposed to a single view of the entire portfolio. In addition, vendors often delve into the individual goals and objectives of different features, sections, and areas of content in the website in order to better understand whether the website is currently meeting its potential.

Audit Report Produce Effective Reports

Being able to produce an effective report which the client is able to act upon is the primary objective of a website audit project. We analyze the style of reporting which the vendor uses to highlight information which is primarily relevant to improving upon the performance of an existing website. It is more important to provide the client with an understanding of what they need to do than what the current issues are.

Efficiency Fast & Efficient Processes

Efficiency is a key element of the evaluation process to ensure the website audits are taking time into consideration when performing an audit. Many businesses which sign up for website audit services are looking for a comprehensive and swift response in order to solve their issues. Our analysis delves into the strategies and processes put into place to save time or make the most efficient use of resources during the audit.

Variety Expansive Variance

The vendors which we recommend in our website audit rankings are vendors which understand that the web is made of a wide variety of technologies. These vendors are capable of performing site audit services on many different frameworks and modern web technologies. This often includes websites built in PHP, Ruby, Python, or any other web technology. In addition, they have an understanding Javascript and Flash amongst other protocols.

 
topseos.com Everywhere!

Reach us from wherever you are. Get the latest updates fast.

 

Copyright 2016 © topseos. Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Legal Disclosure

Request a Quote


,

Talk to a Representative:

 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Request a Call


,

Talk to a Representative:

 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Schedule a Visit


,

Talk to a Representative:

 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact Us

9045 Strada Stell Court
Suite 103
Naples, FL 34109

Talk to a Representative:

800-874-2458
 
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.